Home › Columns › News Columns
Candidates seem to want to move Anderson forward faster
The Cocklebur
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy
Related Links
More News Columns
- Treasure the precious things: Save the Astro & Farm Aid
- Nostalgic for the days of the Sears catalog: 'Tis the season for excessive mail
- Possible origins for 'honey wagons' and famous camels
Rate this Article
Sometimes, it’s easy to forget how far we’ve come.
A little more than two years ago, I pointed out how appalling it was for the city of Anderson municipal elections to go uncontested election cycle after election cycle when the city faced so many challenges.
My call, then, for a “a new generation of leaders” to run for office was based on a sense that long-time residents and old-timers alike were demanding change that no one was interested in supplying.
Within weeks, former Mayor Richard Shirley, who many assumed would lead the city for decades, was toppled by Mayor Terence Roberts, one of two well credentialed challengers.
Fast forward two years, and that urgency for change has gathered pace, with of the four seats that are up for a vote drawing credible challengers.
Each of the has well-established connections to the communities they intend to serve. Each has an intense focus on the challenges ahead, even if many of their ideas need development and refinement.
It’s a shame to see voters distracted by the miniscandal involving whether Jeff Waters impersonated Tommy Dunaway to obtain the incumbent’s water bills to “prove” his At-Large Seat 8 challenger didn’t care about the city because it wasn’t really his home.
It will be ironic if Mr. Waters’ possible undoing at the ballot box results from a botched effort to go negative.
These are idealistic times in the city. And as with all stories of revolution, it began with a recognition that things can get better. Whatever “anger” there is out there comes from folks wishing they hadn’t enslaved themselves to such low expectations in the past.
This political enthusiasm originates with seeing the potential for the Electric City, as with the city of Greenville, to stop playing second fiddle to fumbling, reactionary, laissez-faire county leadership.
Whether it’s the open and oft-stated idea to maintain the higher out-of-city water rate as a bargaining chip for more attention from county leaders, or whether it’s the demand for the city to establish an economic development program of its own, the challengers seem to want to move this whole urban area forward much faster.
It’s nice to see serious talk about serious issues during this campaign. Before voting Tuesday, everyone should check out our exclusive voter guide, our video of our election forums and our stories at IndependentMail.com.
But the real test is whether city residents and like-minded county residents continue to press the winners to continue to formulate innovative and inspirational ideas to grapple with the city’s persistent problems that are holding it back and undermining its leadership claims — substandard amenities, limited employment opportunities, dilapidated neighborhoods, and festering gang activity among them.
Given the fast rise of the Greenville-Spartanburg metroplex, all of us have a stake in the outcome.
Comments
There are 7 responses to this article.
Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.
Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.


IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before you post, consider this:
Please read our official user-contributions policy.
It all comes out in the wash it just depends on how dirty it is....I say the people of anderson are lucky jeffery showed his true colors just in time!!!! If you ever get him to tell us what he has done from age 18-28 maybe we could see another side...but I keep asking. You threw the first stone.....problems at the funeral home?????
quess you cannot hide behind an LLC on this one.
And as things move forward, who will get left behind?
Wow!!! Slim pickings personified.
nick, your writings have gained a reputation in your handling of the dunaway-waters story. from this date forward, your stories will be taken with a grain of salt. there is nothing worse than a journalist perceived to slant their stories to benefit a political contender. you have the facts. you have the opportunity to do the right thing. instead you continue to write this story alluding to wrongdoing by waters and yet seem to have no opinion about clear contradictions and legal discrepancies as to dunaway. you will be forever remembered as dunaways' boy!
two very good links to contribute to this story.
documents in dunaway controversy!
https://secure.filesanywhere.com/v.as...
how does anderson stack up?
http://www.city-data.com/city/Anderso...
On April 8, 2004, Mr. Dunaway set up his law office on 514 S. McDuffie as a non-profit association registered with the Secretary of State as THE DUNAWAY BUILDING CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. "The Dunaway Building Horizontal Property Regime" is registered as an ELEEMOSYNARY INCORPORATION (NON-PROFIT). You may view this entry at
http://webprod.cio.sc.gov/SCSOSWeb/re...
eleemosynary \el-uh-MOS-uh-ner-ee\, adjective:
1. Of or for charity; charitable; as, "an eleemosynary institution."
2. Given in charity; having the nature of alms; as, "eleemosynary assistance."
3. Supported by or dependent on charity; as, "the eleemosynary poor."
You may view the document filed at the Anderson County Courthouse relating to this event at.
https://secure.filesanywhere.com/v.as...
Law office = eleemosynary institution?
Correction - this is for the 301 S. Main Street property. NOT I repeat NOT for his law office on S. McDuffie.
(Requires free registration.)