Home › Columns › News Columns
Open records. Case closed.
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy
More News Columns
- Death of decorated soldier a reminder that our elderly neighbors are fragile
- The Storyteller: Her place in history
- E-mails or phone calls can never take the place of a written thank-you note
Rate this Article
Let’s get this out in the open: Public records should be open records. With rare exceptions, Anderson County records should be open to everyone, including Councilwoman Cindy Wilson.
We’ve said that before in editorials. I’ll state it today individually.
If she wants to see county credit card statements, let her see them, without long delays. If she asks for monthly financial reports, give them to her.
This is the United States, where the First Amendment is synonymous with open records.
This is South Carolina, where a Freedom of Information Act gives citizens a right to look at most public documents. Hiding government records from government officials is preposterous.
So why should a councilman need to propose an open-records ordinance at a council meeting?
That’s what happened Tuesday. In a sad, strange scene, Bob Waldrep read his proposal. Councilman Bill McAbee poked holes in the ordinance, which no doubt had some flaws. The motion failed by a 2-4-1 vote, with Mr. Waldrep and Ms. Wilson voting for and Larry Greer abstaining.
During a break, I asked council chairman Michael Thompson if he would vote for the ordinance if Mr. Waldrep addresses the flaws that Mr. McAbee suggested.
“No way!” Mr. Thompson said, and his explanation smacked of politics. He cited the fact that Ms. Wilson has sued Anderson County Administrator Joey Preston over closed records. The complicated case, which isn’t purely about open records, went to the state Supreme Court last month.
After the meeting, I told Mr. Waldrep that I support the push for open records, but it’s a push he shouldn’t have to make.
When Ms. Wilson and others want to pry into Mr. Preston’s private life, I’ll support the administrator. But when she wants to see public records, I’m on her side.
That’s the problem in this polarized county. Who’s side are you on?
I’m for open records.
When Ms. Wilson faxed a few county credit card statements to the Anderson Independent-Mail in December, she got her wish. We wrote stories. We filed an FOIA request to look at more credit card statements ourselves. We saw them recently and reported on them extensively.
Were we manipulated? Sure. But I’m a little ashamed that it took her prodding to start our digging.
Our digging didn’t result in any big “Gotcha!” findings, but it didn’t hurt to look. Citizens should know where the money goes. Much goes legitimately toward economic development. In that regard, if all of the budgeted dollars were not spent wooing new businesses here, we should scold the county for not spending more.
Ms. Wilson has received mountains of county documents, so don’t buy her cry that she never gets to see any records. But she should get to see all she wants, with reasonable exceptions supported by the law.
Open up and open wide, Anderson County. Case closed.
Comments
There are 4 responses to this article.
Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.
Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.


IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before you post, consider this:
Please read our official user-contributions policy.
Very well said
Yes it was!
should be posted on the internet were everyone can see them, Taxs payers have the right to know were there hard working dollars are going,As far as case close i dont see it happen if you are not guilty post it on line,Bring it out in the opening,share it.with the public its not Joey, or Ms. Wilson money again ITS Anderson County people who pays in money,Dont let Ms. Wilson have to make the decision for you.thats what we are doing,
Open records…? They actually had to try and pass an ordinance to have transparency, honesty and truth in government? I don’t know if I want to laugh or cry!
Oversight is the check to balance power and corruption in government. Through whatever means Mr. Preston has employed to thwart it, it is clear he does not want oversight. The fact that he can thwart oversight is the clearest indicator that he is TOO powerful. The ONLY reason I can think of, that responsible representatives would align themselves with secrecy in government is, they are afraid revelation will stain them as well. Trumping the rights of citizens to enjoy transparency in government. with the rights of a few county employees (to conduct business by whatever means they see fit as long as it produces results for a few happy campers), is trading the peace of mind of many for the smug enrichment of a few. There is one age old method to rooting out corruption and patronage. I give you this excerpt from All the Presidents Men:
Deep Throat: Follow the money.
Bob Woodward: What do you mean? Where?
Deep Throat: Oh, I can't tell you that.
Bob Woodward: But you could tell me that.
Deep Throat: No, I have to do this my way. You tell me what you know, and I'll confirm. I'll keep you in the right direction if I can, but that's all. Just... follow the money.
Case closed? The very fact that Mr. Preston has been influential enough to stonewall oversight or a forensic audit would seem to swing the door open even further. My question to the other Anderson County employees is, “Deep Throat where art though??” Do you not love this County and it’s residents enough to make yourself heard?
If AIM reporters continue to riddle their “news” with opinion, opinion designed to shade and nuance the news and push the readers in one direction or the other, they need to rename this paper the Anderson Enquirer. Unless Anderson wants a monarchy, it would seem prudent to find other smart, qualified candidates for the administrator’s job.
(Requires free registration.)