Login | Site Map | Archives | Electronic Edition | Mobile Edition | Alerts | RSS | Contact Us | Submit News & Photos | Subscriber Services

HomeColumnsNews Columns

Payday lending regulation proposal before S.C. lawmakers merits support

Apparently, I have a reputation for being hard on politicians.

So I thought I’d send a belated valentine to our state senators for having the gumption to cobble together a compromise on payday lending regulation.

It took courage.

I know because I experienced the industry’s wrath last year when I called for a state ban on “evil” payday lending.

It is, it turns out, an American right to get into hock up to your eyeballs, even when there’s a substantial risk that you’ll never get out from under.

Some people took special exception to my faith-based contention that usurious lending was immoral, and irresponsible borrowing was simply wrong and didn’t need to be promoted or protected by government.

No one should interfere with free choices, my critics yelped. Especially do-gooders!

(To which I respond again: Why bother with any laws where one willingly agrees to be exploited or harmed. Prostitution? Drugs? Yeah, baby!)

Even though I called on lawmakers last year to take a stand, I really wasn’t expecting any action.

So I spat my coffee halfway across the room when I read an Associated Press story about the state Senate’s passage of some proposed legislation this week.

It would:

n limit borrowers to $500, or a fourth a customer’s bi-weekly income

n force borrowers to pay with cash or check and wait seven days after paying off one loan to take out another

n create a database of outstanding loans to prevent the lending of more than one loan to borrowers

I was sad that Sen. Kevin Bryant, R-Anderson, wanted to go on the record this week as opposing the bill because of the database’s privacy implications.

As a vocal Christian, I thought he missed an opportunity to remind our supposedly religious state that it is our duty to help protect the weak and the vulnerable.

When it comes to so-called “emergency loans,” our state’s effective 391 percent annual interest rate is, no matter the cliché, legalized extortion in many cases.

Not every payday loan customer is poor, ignorant, helpless or caught in an unending debt cycle, for sure.

But I still find it obscene that our government is complicit in allowing the exploitation of the financial insecurity of a growing swath of American families, rather than doing something to help people earn living wages.

Obviously, I’m not celebrating yet.

There’s a long way to go before this becomes law.

So you might want to call your state representatives again.

They need your encouragement — and your promised vote — if they’re going to face down the well-oiled and well-financed payday lending lobbying machine in an election year.

Comments

There are 3 responses to this article.

Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.

Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.

Click here for our user-contributions policy.

Comments

IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.

Before you post, consider this:

  1. Keep it clean. Comments containing obscene, profane, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented language -- including creative spelling and typographical representations of foul language -- will be removed.
  2. Be truthful. Don't lie or spread rumors about anyone or anything. Stick to discussing what is factually known.
  3. Be nice. Don't threaten anyone, and do not post any comments that involve racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person. Hateful or offensive comments will not be tolerated.
  4. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button to alert us to objectionable comments. Do not respond to trolls or those who seek to harass another poster.
  5. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  6. Help us get it right. If you have information to add to the story or you find a factual error or misspelling send us an email or call the newsroom at 864-260-1274.

Please read our official user-contributions policy.

You can't pass enough laws to protect stupid people from themselves. Example: Seatbelt laws, if you need a law to make you wear a seatbelt, you're stupid.


I'm about tired of these welfare-addicted Democrats dictating how businesses can and can't operate. Consumers choose whether to take on pay day loans- it is not imposed on them. The terms are clearly laid out. It isn't government's responsibility to decide what financial products can and cannot be made available to consumers.


Actually the terms aren't clearly laid out. Once I tried to get a contract for one of those loans so I could look at the terms, but they wouldn't give me a copy of the contract without my taking out the loan and providing a pay stub! And this was one of the supposedly "reputable" payday lenders.




Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

  Want the editors to know how you feel? Click here to say it privately.

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.