Home › Columns › News Columns
Discussion about the solicitor’s race helps ring in 2008
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy
Related Links
More News Columns
- Death of decorated soldier a reminder that our elderly neighbors are fragile
- The Storyteller: Her place in history
- E-mails or phone calls can never take the place of a written thank-you note
Rate this Article
The Cocklebur bloggers heralded the new year with a burst of excitement about the November elections, especially for the Tenth Circuit Solicitor race involving incumbent Chrissy Adams and challenger Sarah Drawdy.
The discussion drew in Ms. Drawdy herself, allowing her to air concerns about the current amount of court time, the current solicitor’s trial experience and use of plea bargaining as well as a drop in conviction rates
“Three murder cases have been lost in less than 24 months. You either don’t try those cases because the evidence isn’t there, or you try them and win,” Ms. Drawdy said.
Angelsc also disagreed with Ms. Adams’ strategy to lower overcrowding at the Anderson County Detention Center.
“I do not think that the solicitor’s job is to just hurry up and clear up cases. Many of the people are dangerous and do not belong on the streets.”
Nancy Jo, a local attorney, former prosecutor and supporter of incumbent solicitor Chrissy Adams, cried “foul!”
“Even mentioning a conviction rate for a particular office, during a particular period of time is ridiculous!! … the role of our solicitor … is NOT to persecute. It IS to carry out justice.”
“Spin!” cried Changeneeded.
“She sounds like a good defense attorney who is trying to keep the status quo, which is a Solicitor who does not put a premium on trying cases… Chrissy has many apologists, but there really are no excuses for not having tried a single case.”
SSHM agreed.
“If all we have hired is a glorified office manager, then I would expect the title of the job to be ‘Glorified Office Manager,’ not ‘Solicitor.’ “
But Coke Stevenson thought that was unfair, calling all solicitors “political beasts.”
“When they show their faces in the courtroom, it is a high-profile case. The rank and file cases that make up our system are carried out by staff. … The Solicitor is a policy maker, not a courtroom advocate. Only in John Grisham books and movies does the DA control and try a case in the courtroom.”
Blogger called the interchange “refreshing,” anticipating a continuing debate among the candidates and their supporters.
So did JD Tippett.
“Love it or hate it, this forum has played and, I hope, will continue to play a role in helping Anderson County residents think for themselves before drawing conclusions they may regret in the future. They’re not all villains. .... They’re not all saints. They’re just people who can take the same set of facts and reach different conclusions.”
Comments
There is 1 response to this article.
Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.
Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.


IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before you post, consider this:
Please read our official user-contributions policy.
Could you check on the term “Taken in Consideration” and Remanded to Magistrate Court. I saw a comment expressed in another paper that stated the Solicitor’s office has a greater conviction rate because it disposes cases in this manner. Does the defendant actually receive a sentence and would this count as a cleared case? This comment went on to quote several issues that I’m concerned about such as repeat offenders making the court rounds on a continual basis with no considerable penalties. It also refers to the fact that arresting officers are not even consulted in these matters, that they have no input into their own cases. How can this happen? Even if the solicitor feels that evidence is lacking, doesn’t the officer have the right to know? Aren’t the solicitors in this state the court representative for these officers? If I had an attorney that represented me in such a poor manner, I would have the option of firing them and seek more competent representation. As a victim, they would also depend on the representation of the solicitor’s office. I do not agree with correcting jail overcrowding with “letting them off the hook” Lets correct overcrowding issues by setting an example that if you break the law, we will penalize you and let the ones considering the life of crime think again.
(Requires free registration.)