Home › Columns › News Columns
Politics really cooking for those lining up at the Cocklebur online buffet
The Cocklebur
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy
Related Links
More News Columns
- A clean start: Man shows that a haircut can be more than style change
- Cambodian friend gets a chance to visit the land of his dreams: America
- With top down and blue sky above, joy ride with friend was memorable
Rate this Article
The past few months have been fascinating ones for political observers — and not just because “third time was the charm” for conservatives who have bitterly protested Anderson County’s past decade of overweening and ineffectual political “leadership.”
We’re proud that the Independent-Mail and Independentmail.com provided local residents an awesome array of reporting and other information on the candidates and their stands in the run-up to elections for the city of Anderson as well as the party primaries for county, state and federal races — not to mention a venue for their political advertising.
More questionably, that information appears to have stoked the robust, wide-ranging and sometimes raucous debate that has raged in Anderson’s new “talksphere,” the ground zero for the politically engaged on the left and the right.
The toppling of three progressive Anderson County Council members obviously was the result of the victorious candidates’ hard work.
But it’s not a stretch to suggest the strength of the protest vote was tied to an echo-chamber effect, where the incessant chatter from a few “celebrity” pundits had a major influence on voters.
The talksphere had its start in the daily rants on local talk radio station WAIM-AM’s morning show, and many still believe that ultra-conservative host Rick Driver is some form of Rasputin-in-waiting.
The Cocklebur, an online talk community that grew out of this column, gave Anderson its first home for respectable political chatter, at least by Internet standards, becoming the secret click of business and community leaders, political junkies and even everyday folks who want to hear the voice of the grass roots.
Since The Cocklebur’s founding in March 2006, more than 600 members have generated more than 40,900 posts, and its relaunch last week at www.thecocklebur.net promises to keep it on a steady growth path.
But that steady stream of local discussion and dissent became a flood when comments were enabled for registered users of Independentmail.com. This year alone, we’ve seen 14,587 comments on stories there, nearly half of them in the last six weeks.
Candidates are learning that they ignore the talksphere at their peril. Anderson County Council District 1 Republican runoff contender Raymond MacKay chose The Cocklebur Forum to answer critics of his decision to vote in a Democratic presidential primary.
It’s easy to bemoan this turn of events. But gossip wasn’t invented with the Internet.
Remember, it was Winston Churchill who said that a lie can travel halfway round the world before truth can get its pants on.
I like to think that at least the truth has earlier warning now — and a chance to catch up.
Comments
There are 6 responses to this article.
Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.
Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.


IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before you post, consider this:
Please read our official user-contributions policy.
this time, nick's article draws you in, by saying all the right things in the first five paragraphs, the neutrality drops from his voice when the opposition's voice becomes "rants", and "a Rasputin in waiting." all pretext is dropped with his closing sentence. whether the truth needs to be warned, or has been left behind, remains to be seen. for a newspaper that proclaims itself to be neutral, you noticeably take sides.
It's a column. It's an analysis. It isn't supposed to be neutral.
When you are the newspaper, everything you say is taken as "news." If it weren't for the fact Nick has tried to play such a large role in representing the status quo and slamming the opposition voice, it might be "just and analysis."
Don't try to argue with him JD, trust me, you'll just get carpal tunnel.
If your average person were to turn to one of these electronic articles, what separates the opinion from the news? Not the look of the page or the authors. In a newspaper there is a real difference between the front page and the editorials. Not so here. Every page looks the same. All of these articles, are on the front page. Your thoughts are ideology driven. Not, average joe driven.
RE:
In_Search_Of_Truth
You hit the nail on the head the AIM has always been tilted far to the left as with most of the media. I don't believe for one minute that they are a neutral newspaper.
(Requires free registration.)