Login | Site Map | Archives | Electronic Edition | Mobile Edition | Alerts | RSS | Contact Us | Submit News & Photos | Subscriber Services

HomeNewsCrime

Three women, defense attorney paint picture of troubled Inman

Roommates talk about how Souers’ was “like a sister”

Jerry Buck Inman, left, who pleaded guilty to the rape and murder of Clemson University student Tiffany Souers, speaks with attorney Symmes Culbertson during a sentencing hearing at the Pickens County Courthouse in Pickens on Monday.

The Associated Press

Jerry Buck Inman, left, who pleaded guilty to the rape and murder of Clemson University student Tiffany Souers, speaks with attorney Symmes Culbertson during a sentencing hearing at the Pickens County Courthouse in Pickens on Monday.

A photo of Tiffany Marie Souers release by her family. Jerry Buck Inman, 37, pleaded guilty Tuesday Aug. 19, 2008 to robbing, kidnapping, raping and murdering Tiffany Marie Souers of Ladue, Mo.

The Associated Press

A photo of Tiffany Marie Souers release by her family. Jerry Buck Inman, 37, pleaded guilty Tuesday Aug. 19, 2008 to robbing, kidnapping, raping and murdering Tiffany Marie Souers of Ladue, Mo.

Bren and Jim Souers, parents of murdered Clemson University student Tiffany Souers, react to her friend's testimonies about her life, during a sentencing hearing for Jerry Buck Inman at the Pickens County Courthouse in Pickens on Monday.

The Associated Press

Bren and Jim Souers, parents of murdered Clemson University student Tiffany Souers, react to her friend's testimonies about her life, during a sentencing hearing for Jerry Buck Inman at the Pickens County Courthouse in Pickens on Monday.

Jerry Buck Inman, of Dandridge, Tenn.,right, talks to his attorney Jim Bannister, before pleading guilty in the 2006 death of Clemson University student Tiffany Marie Souers Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2008, in Pickens, S.C. The convicted sex offender admitted Tuesday that he strangled the 20-year-old South Carolina college student two years ago, leaving her body in her off-campus apartment with her bikini top still wrapped around her neck.(AP Photo/Mary Ann Chastain)

Jerry Buck Inman, of Dandridge, Tenn.,right, talks to his attorney Jim Bannister, before pleading guilty in the 2006 death of Clemson University student Tiffany Marie Souers Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2008, in Pickens, S.C. The convicted sex offender admitted Tuesday that he strangled the 20-year-old South Carolina college student two years ago, leaving her body in her off-campus apartment with her bikini top still wrapped around her neck.(AP Photo/Mary Ann Chastain)

— The second day of testimony in Jerry Buck Inman’s sentencing hearing Tuesday could involve statements from two more witnesses — possibly some of Tiffany Souers’ family.

Inman is in court this week, facing Judge Ned Miller, the man who will decide if he is to live or die for killing 20-year-old Clemson University student Tiffany Souers in May 2006. In August, Inman pleaded guilty to killing Souers. His sentencing hearing is expected to end on Wednesday.

Thirteenth Circuit Solicitor Bob Ariail told Miller that he has one, maybe two more witnesses to call Tuesday in the state’s case as they argue that Inman should be given the death penalty. Souers’ mother and father sat in the courtroom Monday. It is not known for sure if either will take the stand.

Testimony from eight witnesses painted two very different people — one of a young woman who was devoted to family, friends and community and the other of a man who lived through a troubled childhood, began his life of crime at 19 and has tried to kill himself seven times.

In his opening remarks, defense attorney Jim Bannister said Inman has a "biological inheritance" of parents with mental issues and criminal backgrounds and a childhood filled with abuse.

He also said Inman was baptized Friday and that a sentence of life without parole would be worse than death for Inman.

"He is filled with guilt and shame not only for Souers but also for his other victims," Bannister said. "That eats him from the inside out. He can’t understand why he could do what he did. It leads him to the conclusion that he is an animal. And that he deserves to die."

Bannister gave a sketch of Inman’s childhood, revealing the defense’s argument on why Inman should not receive the death penalty.

He told of how Inman, as a boy, was forced to lay on his bunk bed and listen to his sister being molested and of times when Inman was the one being molested — his hands also bound.

Judge Miller learned of how Inman’s father was convicted of trying to rape a woman in much the same way as Inman confessed to doing. Inman was also born to a mother who suffers from schizophrenia, Bannister said.

“Jerry came into this world impaired to start with,” Bannister said.

But in contrast to that picture, the state started its case by presenting a different image.

They started by showing photos of Souers – a smiling, beautiful young woman who was devoted to her friends, family and community before she was brutally murdered at Inman’s hand. Then they spent the rest of the day focusing on three other women whom Inman has admitted to attacking.

All three women describe similar attacks. Their homes were broken into, they were woken up from their sleep by an armed man and then assaulted while their hands were bound behind them.

According to testimony, Inman was convicted on nine crimes between 1987 and 1991. A majority of those charges came from an incident in 1987 when he broke into a Tampa, Fla., apartment and raped a woman there three times while she and her roommate were bound with electrical wire.

He was released from prison on Sept. 1, 2005, after serving less than 20 years for those nine charges.

Then a Sevierville, Tenn., woman told about how she was raped on May 22, 2006 — four days before Souers was found dead. She said she woke up to find a man on top of her with a knife to her throat around 5 a.m. that morning. She was forced to her knees on the floor of her bedroom and tied up with one of her bras while her daughter, who is now 5, cried from the corner of the room.

“He told me to stay calm,” the woman said. “He said, “I’m just here for money and jewelry. I’m not going to hurt anyone. … But then I heard him unbuckling his belt and I said, ‘Oh no. Please don’t do this.”

Another woman, one from Rainesville, Ala., recalled how she was attacked while she was at home on a lunch break on May 23, 2006. She was also held at knife point and tied up by Inman. She was bound at her feet and her hands and forced into her bedroom.

"I was still praying and crying,” the woman said. "He said, it was OK. He laid me back on the bed."

Inman stopped short of actually raping her, the woman said. In his statement he gave to police after he was arrested in Tennessee on June 6, 2006, he said "he just couldn't rape" the Alabama woman.

Authorities revealed at an Aug. 19 hearing that Inman had admitted shortly after his June 2006 arrest to raping and strangling the 20-year-old engineering student from Ladue, Mo., and revealed his handwritten confession.

Souers’ body was discovered in her Central apartment by her roommate on the afternoon of May 26, 2006.

Holly Bergman was that roommate. She was the first to take the stand Monday and in tearful testimony described Souers as a woman who was like a sister to her.

“She loved being that big sister,” Bergman said. “She was always there if you needed her.”

Testimony continues today.

Comments

There are 15 responses to this article.

Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.

Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.

Click here for our user-contributions policy.

Comments

IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.

Before you post, consider this:

  1. Keep it clean. Comments containing obscene, profane, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented language -- including creative spelling and typographical representations of foul language -- will be removed.
  2. Be truthful. Don't lie or spread rumors about anyone or anything. Stick to discussing what is factually known.
  3. Be nice. Don't threaten anyone, and do not post any comments that involve racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person. Hateful or offensive comments will not be tolerated.
  4. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button to alert us to objectionable comments. Do not respond to trolls or those who seek to harass another poster.
  5. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  6. Help us get it right. If you have information to add to the story or you find a factual error or misspelling send us an email or call the newsroom at 864-260-1274.

Please read our official user-contributions policy.

I guess on the one hand, we should feel badly that the guy has mental issues and that we should blame the parents for his biological inheritance??? No, this guy has served time for committing these crimes before; he has the mental presence to know that he can do what he wants to them (victims) and rob them; but he can't control himself??? How 'bout castration and locking him up for as long as it takes to let the victims no longer be bothered by what he did?? I don't know about forgiveness, but as a father of 3 girls, God have mercy on his soul, because I sure don't. He knows what he is doing and plans in advance to do it. He is using the "crazy card" and that is unacceptable.


also, he did not go there to kill her, but did so because she would recognize him, does that not show that he is aware that what he did was wrong and that he can see far enough ahead to know that he must kill to keep from being recognized?


There's a lot more behind Inman's crimes than just a "biological inheritance". Inman's childhood was horrific and while that's no excuse for what he did, it certainly contributed to it.

Inman was raped by his own father and step-brother when he was a child . He began raping when he was a teenager and all of his victims haven't been women,he also raped 2 men in NC.

If Inman's father and step-brother are still alive they should be prosecuted right along with Inman because they helped make him into the monster that he is.


Regardless.........he's still old enough to know right from wrong! Put a bullet in him and be done with it.


Time to juice up Ol' Sparky for one last ride!


A public hanging would be more entertaining.


Since he was out on parole after serving less than 20 years on nine charges should not the parole board be on trial with him? If the court system had did their job he would have never been out of prison. If we held these people accountable you can bet the number of repeat caese will drop because they would not risk letting them out.


If you have a rabid dog you don't sit back and watch it bite people, you put it down!


We have already wasted two years of our money keeping this Somewhat of a person. I would call him what he know's he is, but I don't talk that way anymore, I don't have to say it everybody already knows what I mean, but If I had anything to do with it, I would give him a chance to repent before God, then he wouldn't make it pass the front steps of the courthouse, all I need is simple. His Attorney should be run out of South Carolina. Money hungry people, just wait they will answer. I hold his Attorney at fault more than anyone else. Better than that turn him loose on my property one night, any night, they will carry him out in a bag.


in response to Freedom_Of_Speech

The attorney was appointed by the court and had no choice but to represent this man. As far as being money hungry, exactly who is going to pay the attorney?


It is obvious most people have no clue as to what takes place in the court system. For the most part, attorneys are appointed in death penalty cases. They should not be ridiculed or condemned for doing their job. They are paid by the Office of Indigent Defense and it is not much. Because of the requirements in a death penalty case the attorney pretty much has to close his office down for preparation. Most of his case load is put on hold and then obviously so is his income. It is not a profit making venture by any means. Before you make ignorant comments, ask an attorney or judge what it takes to represent someone on a death penalty case, not only the emotional toll, but the financial toll, your opinion will be totally reversed.


in response to scbuck1030

I completely agree scbuck1030. Excellent comment!


He didn't give his murder victims a chance at life, why should he be allowed to sit in prison on taxpayer money for the next 30 years?


The article makes it seem that the trial is being heard exclusively by a judge, Judge Miller. Even tho' Inman pleaded guilty, thus avoiding a trial on the underlying guilt or innocence, (at that stage he could waive a jury and ask to be tried by a judge only), I believe the US Supreme Court requires that a jury decide the question of life versus death penalty. Is there a jury sitting in this case deciding the penalty?


in response to clemson_girl

I heard you were looking for Scratch. I found him.

http://kliqonline.myfreeforum.org




Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

  Want the editors to know how you feel? Click here to say it privately.

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.